New Delhi, 9 December 2024 – The Supreme Court on Monday dismissed a petition seeking directives to remove highway blockades in Punjab caused by ongoing farmers’ protests. The plea, filed by a Punjab-based social activist, urged the court to ensure unobstructed movement on national highways and railway tracks, which have been blocked for extended periods by agitating farmers.
Key highways, including the Shambu border entry point, have reportedly been blocked for over a year. The situation worsened on October 24, 2024, when several national and state highways were obstructed, causing widespread disruptions.
A Bench led by Justice Surya Kant heard the matter, with the petitioner outlining the severe implications of the blockades. “Punjab serves as a crucial transit route for the Indian Army’s movement towards the northern borders,” the petitioner argued, adding that any obstruction could jeopardize critical defense operations.
The plea also highlighted the hardships faced by ordinary citizens, particularly during medical emergencies. Ambulances and other essential services were frequently delayed, infringing on the constitutional right to free movement.
Concerns over potential external interference were also raised. The petitioner warned that anti-national and foreign forces might exploit the unrest to destabilize Punjab, a state vital to India’s defense and agricultural economy. “Prolonged protests could have long-term implications for national security and stability,” the plea stated.
Despite acknowledging these concerns, the court refrained from issuing any directives. The Bench emphasized that resolving such issues requires dialogue and negotiation between stakeholders.
“The judiciary cannot substitute for the discussions needed to address this matter,” the Bench observed.
